^/<-f / > .-^ ^ * E 241 THE .P8 G6 Copy 2 BURNING OF FALMOUTH (Now Portland, Maine), BY CAPT. MOWATT, IN 1775. BY WILLIAM GOOLD, OF WINDHAM, MAINE. Piepared at the request of the Maine Historical Society, and read before it Feb. 19, 1873. Bi'l rinted from tlie New-England Hist, and Gen. Register for July. BOSTON: FOR PEIVATE DISTEIBUTIOX. 1873. THE BURNING OF FALMOUTH (Now Portland, Maine), BY CAPT. MOWATT, IN 1775. BY WILLIAM GOOLD, OF WINDHAM, MAINE. Prepared at the request of the Maine Historical Society, and read before it Feb. 19, 1873. Reprinted from the New-England Hist, and Gen. Register for July. BOSTON: FOE PRIVATE DISTEIBUTION. 1873. E 741 Edition of 200 Copies. (3^. ^ ». DAVID Clapp & Son, Printers. BUENING or FALMOUTH L\ 177,5. Within a few months an article lias appeared in tlie Ameslury (Mass.) Journal on the Sparhawk family of Kittery, by Mr. John G. Whittier. I have not seen the article itself, but the following which pnrports to be an extract, has Jaeen copied into several papers : "In 177"i Capt. Mowatt, of the British war shiji Canceau, witli three other armed vessels, anchored off Portsmouth, under orders to bombard and destroy the town. He privately went on shore and entered the spacious Sparhawk mansion, at Kittery Point. He became so ftiscinated with Mary Sparhawk that she persuaded him to save the town and tail to Portland, then Fahnouth, which he laid in ashes."' I have no knowledge of the authority for this statement." It probably rests upon tradition, but I think it is an error. That there was a Jliss Mary Hirst Sparhawk, of the age of about twenty years, then living at her father the Hon. Nathaniel Sparhawk's splendid mansion at Kittery Point, there is no doubt. That she was fascinating, is equally certain ; for history says she fascinated Dr. Charles Jarvis, of Boston, and married him. On the death of her husband she returned, about the year 1788, to the home of her childhood, and died there in 1815. One of her brothers, Wm. Pepper- rell vSparliawk, in compliance with the will of his grandfather, Sir William Pepperrcll. had succeeded to bis house, title, and the most of his large estate. By an act of the general court, hedio]iped the name of Sparhawk, and became AVilliam (afterward Sir William) Pepperrell. lie with all the family adlicred to the mother-country at the breaking out of the revolution. ' We learn tliat Mr. Whiitier pnve this tradition upon the aiitliurity of Brewster's Bitinliles About Portsmouth, 2i scr., p. 187. The coufiiscation act of 1778 swept away all liis property except the plate, which was very valuable, and which was by that act allowed to be removed. Two or three pieces were given to individuals and are still preserved, but what remained was considered of such value that Col. Moulton, of York, with six soldiers, was ordered to guard its conveyance to Boston for ship- ment to its owner in London, whither he had gone in 1775. He died there in 1816, aged 70.' It is well known that, during the colonial troubles, the Sparhawk house was the rendezvous and hiding-place of most of the chief loyalists of the vicinity. Both of my great-grandfathers were Kittery men : one of them sent his oldest son to Bunker Hill, and both took the opposite side to the Sparhawks. The feme of the tory gatherings at that house has been handed down as a family tradition. The fires of hospitality still burn in the broad fireplaces of this now restored home of colonial aristocracy. Your society and their invited guests will recollect their polite recejition at this house, on their tour to York and Kittery, in the autumn of 1871. Capt. Mowatt, in the British sloop-of-war Canceau, had been on the New-England station a year or more, and no doubt had, while patrolling the eastern coast, often visited the fine harbor at the mouth of the Piscataqua ; and as the Sparhawk house and its occupants were prominent among the celebrities of that aristocratic neighborhood, he had probably often been their welcome guest. We can readily imagine him landing from his boat at the stairs at the foot of the lawn, where a few years before the elder Sir Wm. Pepiier- rell had kept his barge, and negro crew in uniform, and entering that long avenue of elms whose stumps wo saw, now sad monuments of vandalism. The house has been restored in the original style, but the elms cannot be in one generation as they were when the British captain, in knee-breeches and buckles, laced coat with ruffles at his hands, cocked hat with gold loop and button, hurried over that ornamental pavement (yet perfect, although 130 years old), to spend an hourwilh the courtly Miss Mary, while waiting for the ebb-tide to take his ship to sea. This was not only a splendid man- sion, but, like an eagle perched on a crag watching its prey, from its elevated situation he could watch the colonists in their little vessels far at sea. No one would better appreciate this scene and its surroundings than Mr. Whit- tier, nor is there one who could describe it in more befitting verse. We know that young ladies, of Miss Sparhawk's age and station, often have great influence with men in power. Sacred history tells us of one who, on Herod's birth day, danced before him and pleased him so much that at her request he save her the head of the moral censor wlmliiid displeased him ; ' Sec an article on tlie reppcrrcll Gencalogj' by the late Uslicr Parsons, M.D., in the New-England Hist, and Gi;n. RroisTiiU, vol. xx. pp. 1 — 6. but I think there was no hint tiiat Miss Sparhawk practised any blau- dishments before the naval commander, only that he became so fascinated that at her request be spared the neighboring town, and poured out liis "wrath on poor devoted Falmouth. After this long |)reface, we will examine the authentic history of the transactions at Falmouth, during the colonial difficulties, and tefore the burning, which will show that Mowatt had a grudge against the town, and that Admiral Graves, who commanded the British fleet then blockading Boston, had said that if certain things were done, " he would send an armed force and beat the town down about their ears." These things were done, and no doubt Mowatt was too glad to execute the orders he had solicited from the admiral. My authorities for this narration of facts, are principally the journals of of the two ministers of the town, begun long before and kept through the revolution. That of the Rev. Thomas Smith was compiled by Samuel Freeman, Esq., in 1821. Mr. Freeman was a native of old Falmouth, and witnessed the commotions until a short time before the bombardment. He was elected sole delegate from Falmouth to the provincial congress, and was in attendance at its session in Watertown. He held that office, by reelection, three years, during two of which he was secretary of that body. His public services well qualified him to compile the journal, and to supply those copious notes and explanations which his edition contained. Copies of his edition are now very rare. I know of only one perfect copy. It is to be regretted that Mr. Willis felt compelled to omit, in his edition, the most of the appendix to Mr. Freeman's, which contains his notes and explanations. I have a distinct recollection of Mr. Freeman fifty years ago, whose venerable figure, in the costume of colonial times, occupied the dea- con's seat beneath the high pulpit, and facing the congregation, in the old wooden church of the first parish in Portland. He died in 18.31, aged 87 years. Having given my authorities, I will proceed with my sketch, which I think will explain why the town was burned. The people of the county of Cumberland, and especially those of Falmouth, began early to express indignation at the acts of Parliament bearing on the colonies. Soon after the passage of the odious stamp act of 176.5, a vessel arrived at Falmouth from Halifax witii tlie hated stamps, and they were deposited in the custom-house. The people immediately assem- bled and marched to the custom-house, demanded and received the stamps, then fixed them to the top of a pole, carried them in procession through the streets, to a fire prepared for the purpose, and burned them. In 1774 in a town meeting the citizens "resolved that we will not buy nor sell any India tea whatever, after this third day of Feb. until the act that lays a duty on it is repealed." There were then 2500 lbs. of tea in the hands of the dealers in town. Another resolve, passed at this meeting! acknowledges their obligation to '' the people of Boston, for their early notice of approaching danger," and for " their intrepid behavior on the late tea-ships' arrival, and trust they will still be our watch-tower, and they may depend on our utmost endeavors to support them at all times, in defence of their rights and liberties." Also, " we rejoice that though surrounded by fleets and armies, you yet remain firm and resolute." At the close of the proceedings the town " voted that a committee be chosen to meet committees of other towns to consult on the alarming state of public affairs." On the day of the closing of the port of Boston, June 14, 1774, the bell of the meeting-house in Falmouth was muffled and tolled from sunrise until nine o'clock in the evening. The result of the vote of the town in February, inviting other towns to choose delegates to meet their's, was that a county convention was held at Mrs. Greele's little one-story tavern^ in Falmouth, on the 21st day of September, 1774. This was the first political county convention held in Cumberland, of which the record has been preserved. It was composed of thirty-three delegates from the nine old towns of the county. Although a hundred years save one, have intervened since it was held, there has been no im- provement on the course then adopted to secure a true expression of the popular will. The people of the country towns chose their delegates who attended, and then they went themselves, to see that their delegates obeyed their instructions, as the record shows. After organizing by the choice of the Hon. Enoch Freeman for chairman, and his son Samuel Freeman, our historian, for clerk, the record says : " A committee from the body of the people who were assembled at the entrance to the town, waited on this con- vention to see if they would choose a committee of one out of each town, to wait on Mr. Sherift'Tyng, to see whether he woidd act in his office under the late acts of Parliament for regulating the government." By these acts the appointment of all civil officers was taken from the people and vested in the ci-owu, SheritF Tyng was summoned before the convention and attend(^d, and subscribed to a writtcTi declaration " that he would not as sheriff of the county, or otherwise, act in conformity to, or by virtue of, said acts, unless by the genei'al consent of said county." This declaration was voted to be satisfactory to the convention. While these proceedings were going on in the convention, the people from the country had marched to the town house. The record continues : " The convention then formed themselves into a committee to accomjiany Mr. Sheriff Tyng to the body of the people, to present the declaration." The people '' voted it satisfiictory, and after refreshing themselves, returned peaceably to their own homes." The convention met again in the afternoon, and a committee, of whom Samuel Freeman was chairman, reported a long and spirited preamble and resolutions, which were adojited. Tiie second resolution would, if carried out now, be a public benefit. It was as follows : " That every one would do his utmost to discourage lawsuits, and likewise compromise disputes as much as possible." " Each member was interrogated separately, and pledged himself not to accept any commission under the late acts of parliament." Mr. Freeman says his notes, after he left Falmouth, were transcribed from the letters of a gentleman in Falmouth to his friend in Watertown. The friend in Watertown was no doubt himself, as he was then in attendance at the Provincial Congress, and the only delegate from Falmouth. From some circumstances and expressions I am led to believe that the writer of the letters was Gen. Jedediah Preble, a leading merchant of the town, and a member of the committee of inspection. Capt. Samuel Coulson had been for several years engaged in the mast business between Falmouth and Bristol, England, from whence he came, and had married a daughter of the elder Dr. Coffiu, of Falmouth, and resided in the doctor's house on King street. He had built a very large ship for those days at the foot of his street. She was of 1000 tons. To ship masts required large vessels. Capt. Coulson was violently opposed to the popular sentiment of the colonies, and made himself very obnoxious to the people. On the second of May, 1775, a vessel of Coulson's arrived from Bristol, with rigging, sails, and stores, for the new ship. There was a committee of inspection, com- posed of leading men of the town, one of whom was Samuel Freeman. This committee was called together at the library chamber the same day of the arrival of Coulson's vessel. There was a compact between the colonies called the " American Association," the provisions of which may be understood from what took place in the committee meetings. Coulson was by vote desired to attend on the committee. In answer to questions he stated that the vessel was from Bristol, with stores and materials for his new ship. A sub-committee was chosen to go on board and see if there were any other goods there. At an adjourned meeting of the committee the next day, it was voted that to allow Capt. Coulson to land his goods, and appropriate them to fit out his new ship, would be a violation of the " American Association," and directed that they be sent back to England without breaking the packages. 8 This was communicated to Capt. Coulson by a sub-committee. Coulson immediately attended, and said tlie vessel must be repaired before she could go to sea, and in order to do that the freight must be lauded ; but the vote was adhered to, and the proceedings of the meeting were by vote, posted up in a public place in the town. Instead of obeying the order to return the goods to England, Coulson left for Boston, under the pretence of asking leave of the provincial congress to rig his ship, and procured the assist- ance of Capt. IMowatt in the sloop-of-war Canceau, to aid and protect him in rigging and loading his ship, and proceeded to land his materials. During the excitement caused \>y Coulson's bringing, the vessel to assist him in violating the provisions of the Association, on the 21st of April news arrived of the battle of Lexington. On the 23d a town-meeting was held, and spirited proceedings were adopted, notwithstanding the Canceau was lying in the harbor, whose commander, Coulson, and others were constantly urging to make some demonstration. The news of the battle of Lexington set the whole country in a blaze of excitement. At Falmouth a company of 60 soldiers was raised and hurried oft' to Cambridge. Next came, what Mr. Freeman calls, " Thompson's war." On Tuesday, the 9th of May, Col. Samuel Thompson, of Brunswick, with about fifty soldiers, came in boats and landed secretly on the north side of the neck, and encamped in a grove of pines. Each man had a small sprig of spruce in his hat ; and a small spruce tree with the lower branches cut off" was their standard. They seized and detained several persons who happened to pass that way, in order to conceal their camp from the towns-people. About one o'clock, P. M., Capt. Mowatt, his surgeon, and the Rev. Mr. Wiswall, of St. Paul's Church, were walking for pleasure in the vicinity, when they were seized and made prisoners. As soon as Lieut. Hogg, then in command of the Canceau, heard of the capture of Capt. Mowatt, he sent a threaten- ing letter on shore. Gen. Preble, in a letter to the provincial congress dated on the 14th, says " he clapped springs to his cables and swore if the gentle- men were not released before six o'clock, he would fire on the town. He fired two cannon, and although there were no shot in them, it frightened the women and children to such a degree that some crawled under the wharves, some down cellar, and some out of town." Some of the prominent men of the town visited Thompson's camp to. urge the release of the prisoners. Thompson and his men were inflexible, but night coming on, they concluded to march the prisoners to Marston's tavern for a more sheltered consultation. The soldiers, including a Fal- mouth company which had assisted in the escort, were paraded in front of the house. Thompson argued that open hostilities between the colonies and the mother-country existed ; that Providence had thrown the prisoners 9 ill Ills way, and that they were riglitly held. He finally found that the whole town was against him, and at about nine o'clock he concluded to release them, by their giving their parole to come on shore the next morn- ~ing ; Gen. Preble and Col. Freeman pledging themselves for them. The principal reason given by the Falmouth men for urging tlieir release, was that several vessels were daily expected with corn and flour, of which the town stood very much in need. Parson Smith, in his journal, under date of the 26th of June, says: — '• People are apprehensive of a famine, there being a scarcity of corn and flour." A few days after, he mentions the arrival of three vessels, " with corn and flour." "So we are plentifulty relieved from all fears of famine. Blessed be God." At the appointed hour of nine, on Wednesday morning, Thompson began to look for his prisoners, but none came ; whereupon his men became furi- ous, and seized their sureties, Preble and Freeman, and kept them all day without dinner. In the afternoon they sent to Mowatt to know why he did not keep his parole. His reply was, that one of his men whom he had sent on shore to his washerwoman, had overheard several threats from sol- diers to shoot him as soon as he made his appearance, and he declined coming. During the afternoon a large force of militia from the country, numbering five or six hundred, arrived, and being greatly enraged on learn- ing of Mowatt's release, threatened violence to Gen. Preble and Col. Freeman, the sureties. All the officers of the militia, including those of Falmouth, next resolved themselves into a board of war, for the examination of tories, and sum- moned several persons before them. Some came. The Rev. Mr. AViswall had not gone on board the ship, and attended ut the appointed time. In answer to questions, lie declared his abhorrence of the doctrine of passive obedience and non-resistance, and was released. Several others were examined, but none were punished. To keep peace and secure his release with Col. Freeman, Gen. Preble was obliged to furnish the troops with several barrels of bread, a quantity of cheese, and two barrels of rum for each company. The soldiers entered Capt. Coulson's house and took what they wanted, and used the house for a barrack. Some of them became exhilarated by the liquor found in Coulson's cellar, and one, named Calvin Lombard, went down to the shore and fired two balls from a musket, deep into the side of the Canceau. The fire was returned from a " fusee," but no damage was done. Thursday, the 11th, was a general fast, which Gen. Preble and Col. Freeman were not prepared for, as the soldiers had obliged them to fast the day before. 10 The soldiers seized one of Coulsoii's boats and dragsjed it throiigli tlie streets, to a place of safety, aud the next day they seized one of Mowatt's, and hauled it to the same place. Mowatt threatened to fire on the town if they ■were not returned, 1>ut Mr. Freeman's friend writes to him at Watertown that "he has not fired yet, and here I sit writing at my desk in the old place, being fully convinced that Mowatt never will fire on the town in any case whatever." He also • writes : " the soldiers have to-day carried oflT Mr. Tyng's Bishop, a piece of plate worth 500 pounds, old tenor, and his laced hat." These were afterwards returned to Mrs. Ross, the uKJtlier of Mrs. Tyng, by a resolve of the provincial congress. Tlie property destroyed in Coulsou's house, and value